Tired of spending long hours at the desk? Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping how legal work gets done.
Many legal professionals are turning to AI prompts for lawyers as a practical way to accelerate contract drafting, case strategy, and related tasks.
Legal teams have seen firsthand how well-designed prompts can streamline workflows that once required hours of manual effort. With the right prompts, work that previously took an entire afternoon can now be completed in minutes.
This guide explores some of the most effective AI prompts lawyers can use to improve efficiency without sacrificing quality.
Key Takeaways
AI prompts for lawyers can significantly reduce time spent on contract drafting, review, proofreading, and other tasks.
Adding specific details, such as jurisdiction, date range, and case issues, to prompts helps AI generate relevant and accurate responses.
AI can help improve efficiency, but lawyers must review all content for final judgment and nuanced decision-making.
Top 15 AI Prompts for Lawyers
AI prompts for attorneys can dramatically improve how lawyers draft, review, and negotiate contracts. The prompts below cover the most common and high-impact tasks lawyers face in day-to-day practice.
Contract Drafting Prompts
Lawyers can speed up drafting a legal document by prompting legal AI writing tools for assistance. Prompts help the AI generate more relevant content.
1. Draft Defined Terms
Use this prompt when an agreement uses key terms that lack clear definitions or require refinement to avoid ambiguity.
Example prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney drafting definitions. Your task is to draft precise definitions for the following terms used in this agreement:
[List the terms that need definition]
DEFINITION STANDARDS (Required):
* Provide a clear, specific definition for each term
* Avoid circular definitions
* Use terminology consistent with industry standards and this agreement
* Consider how the definition affects the interpretation of key provisions
PRECISION REQUIREMENTS:
* Eliminate ambiguity through precise language
* Include or exclude specific items where necessary
* Address boundary cases or gray areas
* Ensure definitions support intended interpretation
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Draft each definition in standard definition format
* Explain why the definition is structured as written
* Note any provisions particularly affected by this definition
* Flag potential interpretation issues resolved by definition
Ensure definitions are legally precise and commercially practical. Your primary focus is on creating definitions that eliminate ambiguity and support the represented party's interpretation of key provisions.
I represent [Party]."
Use this as a starting point and refine it for your client's needs. Research suggests that formulating clear instructions and guidelines helps AI produce high-quality output.
Pro Hack: Spellbook, a legal-specific AI tool, comes with a clause library that suggests clauses based on best practices to help ensure the language is airtight.
2. Draft Limitation of Liability Clauses
Use this prompt when drafting a limitation-of-liability clause that allocates risk while remaining commercially reasonable and enforceable.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney drafting liability provisions. Your task is to draft a limitation of liability provision that protects the represented party while remaining commercially reasonable.
LIABILITY FRAMEWORK (Required):
* Liability caps (monetary limits on damages)
* Excluded damages (consequential, indirect, punitive)
* Carve-outs from limitations (what remains unlimited)
* Relationship to indemnification provisions
* Proportionality to contract value and risk allocation
BALANCING CONSIDERATIONS:
* Adequate protection without being unreasonable
* Industry standards for this type of agreement
* Counterparty acceptance likelihood
* Enforceability under applicable law
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Draft complete limitation of liability provision
* Explain the rationale for cap amounts and exclusions
* Identify carve-outs with justification
* Note relationship to other risk allocation provisions
Draft language appropriate for [specify contract type if relevant] under [jurisdiction] law. Your primary focus is on creating limitation-of-liability language that balances risk protection with commercial reasonableness.
I represent [Party]."
Contract Review Prompts
Manually reviewing contracts can take hours. AI can enhance contract review, spotting red flags and inconsistencies in minutes. One study found that AI achieved an average accuracy rate of 94% in spotting risks in non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), compared to an average of 85% for experienced lawyers.
3. Find Imbalances in Party Obligations
Use this prompt when reviewing an agreement to evaluate whether rights, obligations, and risk allocation remain proportionate between the parties.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney analyzing contractual fairness. Your task is to identify asymmetries in rights, obligations, and risk allocation between parties.
RECIPROCITY ANALYSIS (Required):
* Reciprocal obligations (are they truly mutual)
* Liability caps and exclusions (are they balanced)
* Termination rights (does one party have broader exit rights)
* Indemnification scope (who protects whom from what)
* Warranty obligations (are they proportional)
IMBALANCE IDENTIFICATION:
* One-sided risk allocation
* Disproportionate obligations
* Unbalanced remedies or enforcement rights
* Asymmetric termination or amendment rights
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Flag imbalanced provisions clearly
* Explain how the imbalance disadvantages the represented party
* Compare obligations between parties side-by-side
* Recommend corrections to restore balance
Assess the balance of obligations between parties. Your primary focus is flagging provisions that disproportionately favor one side and disadvantage the represented party.
I represent [Party]."
4. Spot Unusual or Non-Standard Terms
Use this prompt when reviewing a contract to identify provisions that depart from typical market standards and risk allocations.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney with extensive market knowledge. Your task is to identify provisions that deviate from market standards.
MARKET COMPARISON (Required):
* Unusually broad or narrow scope
* One-sided obligations or benefits
* Atypical liability allocations
* Non-standard termination rights
* Uncommon pricing or payment structures
DEVIATION ANALYSIS:
* Terms significantly more favorable to one party
* Provisions absent from typical market agreements
* Clauses that exceed or fall short of industry norms
* Strategic implications of unusual terms
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Flag unusual provisions first
* Explain how each deviates from the market
* Assess whether the deviation favors one party
* Provide market context for comparison
Compare this agreement to typical market standards for this type of transaction. Your primary focus is flagging provisions that are unusual or non-standard and explaining their strategic implications.
I represent [Party]."
5. Find Missing Essential Terms
Use this prompt when reviewing a draft agreement to ensure it includes all essential, industry-standard terms for effective risk management and performance.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney identifying gaps in contract coverage. Your task is to identify missing essential terms, standard provisions, or industry-standard protections.
COMPLETENESS REVIEW (Required):
* Essential terms for this type of agreement
* Standard protective provisions are typically included
* Industry-specific provisions expected
* Defined terms that should be added
* Boilerplate provisions commonly found
GAP ANALYSIS:
* Critical missing terms that create risk
* Standard provisions absent from this agreement
* Protections are typically included but omitted
* Terms needed for practical implementation
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Prioritize missing terms by importance
* Explain why each missing provision matters
* Provide examples of standard language
* Recommend specific additions
Identify missing essential terms and provisions that should be included for this type of agreement. Your primary focus is flagging gaps that create risk or uncertainty for the represented party.
I represent [Party]."
Commercial Contract Prompts
Commercial contract prompts support practical, risk-focused review and drafting of commercial agreements. They help identify issues that affect enforceability, operational feasibility, and business risk. These prompts also guide revisions that align legal terms with commercial objectives.
6. Review Data Handling
Use this prompt when an agreement involves the collection, processing, storage, or transfer of personal or sensitive data.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney with expertise in data privacy and cybersecurity law. Your task is to identify potential data-liability exposures in this agreement.
DATA COMPLIANCE REVIEW (Required):
* Privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA, PIPEDA, and jurisdiction-specific regulations)
* Security requirements (technical, physical, and administrative safeguards)
* Breach-notification obligations (timing, scope, responsibilities)
* Cross-border data-transfer restrictions (adequacy decisions, standard contractual clauses)
* Data retention and deletion requirements
LIABILITY ASSESSMENT:
* Provisions that create regulatory compliance risk
* Gaps in data protection obligations
* Unclear allocation of data breach responsibility
* Missing or inadequate security standards
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Flag high-risk data provisions first
* Explain regulatory compliance issues
* Identify which party bears liability for data incidents
* Note missing data protection provisions
Flag all data handling provisions. Your primary focus is assessing whether the current language creates regulatory or commercial risk for the represented party.
I represent [Party]."
7. Review Cash Flow and Credit Risks
Use this prompt when reviewing an agreement that includes payment obligations, credit support, or financial covenants that may affect liquidity.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney analyzing financial provisions. Your task is to identify potential cash-flow impacts and financial obligations that could strain business operations.
CASH FLOW IMPACT:
* Terms that create liquidity constraints
* Provisions that accelerate payment obligations
* Financial reporting burdens
* Conditions that trigger payment defaults
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Flag the highest-risk financial provisions first
* Explain cash-flow implications for each term
* Identify provisions that could trigger default
* Recommend modifications to reduce financial strain
Assess all financial provisions in this agreement. Your primary focus is flagging terms that create cash-flow or credit risk for the represented party.
I represent [Party]."
Risk Assessment Prompts
Risk assessment prompts focus on identifying provisions that create legal, operational, or financial exposure for the represented party. They help surface hidden risks, clarify how those risks are allocated, and support informed decisions about mitigation, negotiation, or acceptance.
8. Review IP Rights and Ownership
Use this prompt when reviewing an agreement to evaluate how intellectual property provisions affect ownership, use rights, and exposure to IP-related risk.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney specializing in intellectual property. Your task is to identify all IP-related provisions and assess how they impact the represented party's IP position.
IP RISK ASSESSMENT (Required):
* Ownership disputes (who owns what, especially work product)
* Infringement exposure (representations, warranties, indemnification)
* Licensing restrictions (field of use, territory, exclusivity)
* Confidentiality vulnerabilities (trade secrets, proprietary information)
* IP escrow and source code provisions
OPERATIONAL IMPACT:
* IP terms that could limit business operations
* Restrictions that could constrain growth or pivots
* Provisions that create ongoing IP obligations
* Missing IP protections
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Organize findings by risk severity (high, medium, low)
* Explain the business impact for each IP provision
* Identify missing IP protections
* Flag any IP terms that could block future opportunities
Identify all IP-related provisions in this agreement. Your primary focus is on highlighting IP terms that could limit operations, create liability exposure, or restrict the represented party's business flexibility.
I represent [Party]."
Document Summarization Prompts
Researchers found that 77% of legal professionals already use AI to summarize documents. Tell AI to summarize a legal agreement, and it will extract actionable insights and key takeaways to save time.
Pro Tip: AI summaries are a great starting point. However, always review and refine them to ensure thorough legal accuracy.
9. Provide an Executive Summary
Use this prompt when stakeholders need a high-level understanding of a contract without reviewing the full document.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney preparing executive briefings. Your task is to create a concise executive summary of this document.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENT (Required):
* Key business terms (price, scope, duration, deliverables)
* Major risks and how they are allocated
* Strategic implications for the company
* Critical decision points or unusual terms
* Recommended action (approve, negotiate, reject)
AUDIENCE CONSIDERATIONS:
* Focus on business impact over legal technicalities
* Highlight terms that affect strategy or operations
* Flag anything that requires executive attention
* Keep the length appropriate for busy executives
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Lead with a one-sentence deal description
* Use clear headings for each major section
* Bullet key points for scannability
* Bold critical terms or risks
* End with a clear recommendation
Create a concise executive summary highlighting key business terms, major risks, and strategic implications. Your primary focus is on distilling the agreement into essential business points that executives need for decision-making.
I represent [Party]."
10. Summarize Redline Changes
Use this prompt when reviewing a redlined contract to quickly understand how the latest draft differs from the prior version.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney analyzing redlined documents. Your task is to summarize all changes between the previous draft and this redlined version.
CHANGE CATEGORIZATION (Required):
* Material changes (substantive modifications to rights or obligations)
* Minor changes (clarifications, corrections, non-substantive edits)
* New provisions added
* Provisions deleted
* Recommended response (accept, counter, or reject)
ANALYSIS APPROACH:
* Business and legal implications of each change
* Whether changes favor one party
* Cumulative effect of multiple changes
* Strategic priorities for response
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Organize by materiality (critical changes first)
* Provide section references for each change
* Explain "what changed" and "why it matters."
* Include tactical recommendations for each material change
For each material change, explain the business and legal implications, assess the importance, and recommend a response. Your primary focus is on identifying substantive modifications that affect the represented party's rights, obligations, or risk allocation.
I represent [Party]."
Quality Control Prompts
An unclear section or a misplaced comma in a contract can lead to costly misunderstandings. AI tools help spot grammatical errors, ambiguous and inconsistent phrasing. Humans can overlook errors; AI catches nearly all of them.
11. Proofread Contracts
Use this prompt when conducting a final quality control review of a contract before execution or delivery.
Example prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney with meticulous attention to detail. Your task is to evaluate the overall quality of drafting, including clarity, precision, and enforceability.
DRAFTING QUALITY REVIEW (Required):
* Ambiguous language requiring clarification
* Undefined terms that need definition
* Inconsistent terminology or formatting
* Grammatical or typographical errors
* Internal contradictions or conflicts
ENFORCEABILITY ASSESSMENT:
* Provisions that may be subject to interpretation disputes
* Terms that lack precision or measurability
* Vague obligations or standards
* Missing elements for enforceability
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Organize findings by severity (critical, moderate, minor)
* Provide specific location references for each issue
* Explain why each issue matters
* Suggest precise corrections
Evaluate the overall quality of legal drafting in this agreement. Your primary focus is identifying ambiguous language, undefined terms, and potential interpretation disputes that could undermine enforceability.
I represent [Party]."
Spellbook can automatically proofread documents in Microsoft Word. No prompts needed. It suggests fixes for ambiguous language as well.
With Spellbook, lawyers get a reliable assistant that rarely misses a detail, reviewing contracts with speed and confidence. AI polishes legal documents. However, always review them for nuanced legal language and potential legal errors.
Negotiation & Strategy Prompts
Negotiation and strategy prompts support disciplined, outcome-driven contract negotiations. These prompts help lawyers advocate for their clients by translating legal analysis into clear priorities, leverage points, and practical negotiation strategies.
12. Identify Top Negotiation Priorities
Use this prompt when preparing for contract negotiations to focus discussions on the issues that matter most to the represented party.
Example Prompt:
"You are an experienced legal negotiator conducting strategic analysis. Your task is to identify the top 5 negotiation priorities for the represented party and suggest potential trade-offs.
PRIORITY IDENTIFICATION (Required):
* Most critical issues ranked by business impact
* Terms that create the greatest risk or constraint
* Provisions most misaligned with business objectives
* Deal-breakers vs. important but negotiable items
* Strategic value of each priority
TRADEOFF ANALYSIS:
* What you could concede to gain priority items
* Which less-important terms could be traded away
* Creative compromises that advance key objectives
* Bundling strategies for negotiation efficiency
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* List the top 5 priorities in rank order (most critical first)
* Explain why each is a priority
* Suggest specific tradeoffs for each priority
* Provide negotiation talking points for key issues
Analyze this document to identify the top 5 negotiation priorities. Your primary focus is on determining which issues matter most to the represented party and what concessions could advance those priorities.
I represent [Party]."
13. Analyze Counterparty Position
Use this prompt when preparing for or advancing negotiations to understand the counterparty’s motivations, constraints, and leverage.
Example Prompt:
"You are an experienced legal negotiator conducting a position analysis. Your task is to assess the counterparty's negotiating position and recommend strategies to strengthen the represented party's position.
COUNTERPARTY ANALYSIS (Required):
* Their likely priorities based on the deal structure
* Constraints they face (timeline, alternatives, internal approvals)
* Leverage points (where they need this deal)
* Weaknesses in their position (arguments that will not hold up)
* Opportunities to reframe (different ways to structure terms)
STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS:
* How to leverage counterparty constraints
* Arguments likely to persuade them
* Concessions that cost the represented party little but benefit the counterparty
* Timing and sequencing of negotiation moves
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Analyze the counterparty's likely position and constraints
* Identify the represented party's leverage points
* Recommend specific negotiation strategies
* Provide tactical guidance for key discussions
I represent [Party]. The counterparty is [describe opposing party if known]. Your primary focus is assessing the counterparty's negotiating position and recommending strategies that strengthen the represented party's leverage."
14. Draft Counterproposal Language
Use this prompt when responding to proposed contract language that raises legal or commercial concerns but still requires a constructive path forward.
Example Prompt:
"You are a senior contract attorney drafting counterproposals. Your task is to draft alternative language that addresses the represented party's concerns while meeting the counterparty's underlying interests.
Current provision: [paste the clause you are countering]
The represented party's concerns are: [specify concerns, or omit to let AI infer from context]
COUNTERPROPOSAL APPROACH (Required):
* Address the represented party's specific concerns
* Acknowledge the counterparty's legitimate interests
* Provide a commercially reasonable middle ground
* Use clear, enforceable language
INTEREST ANALYSIS:
* What the counterparty is trying to accomplish
* How to achieve their goal with less risk to the represented party
* Win-win formulations, if possible
* Fallback positions if the primary proposal is rejected
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Draft complete alternative language
* Explain how it addresses the represented party's concerns
* Show how it meets the counterparty's underlying needs
* Provide a rationale for the approach taken
Draft a counterproposal that addresses concerns while remaining commercially reasonable. Your primary focus is on creating alternative language that protects the represented party while acknowledging counterparty interests.
I represent [Party]."
15. Find Win-Wins
Use this prompt when negotiations reach a point where collaboration can unlock additional value for both sides.
Example Prompt:
"You are an experienced legal negotiator, finding collaborative solutions. Your task is to identify modifications that improve the agreement for both parties while advancing the represented party's key objectives.
For each win-win opportunity:
WIN-WIN IDENTIFICATION (Required):
* What changes in the provision
* Why it benefits both parties
* How it advances the represented party's priorities
* Why the counterparty should accept
* Implementation requirements
MUTUAL BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
* Terms where both parties' interests align
* Provisions that create unnecessary friction
* Opportunities to expand value for both sides
* Low-cost concessions that matter to the other side
OUTPUT FORMAT:
* Identify 3-5 win-win opportunities
* Explain mutual benefits clearly
* Show how each advances the represented party's objectives
* Provide negotiation framing for each opportunity
I represent [Party]. Your primary focus is identifying opportunities for mutually beneficial modifications that make everyone happier while advancing the represented party's key priorities."
Prompt Engineering Best Practices
Prompt engineering matters for lawyers because the quality of an AI output depends heavily on how the task is framed. AI tools can save the average lawyer 132 to 210 hours in legal research per year when done right.
Use a structured prompt framework: Structured prompts guide the AI through legal reasoning. Clear sections reduce missed issues and improve consistency.
Be explicit and specific: Vague prompts produce vague language. Specific instructions lead to tighter drafting and clearer risk allocation.
Specify the output format upfront: This controls how information is organized. This improves usability for review and decision-making.
Assign a legal persona and audience: Specifying a legal role shapes the level of rigor and tone. Identifying the audience ensures appropriate detail and framing.
Build context intentionally (quality > quantity): Relevant context improves accuracy and relevance. Unnecessary background can dilute results.
Break complex tasks into steps: Smaller tasks reduce error and improve depth. Step-by-step prompting mirrors legal workflows.
Use iterative prompting to refine results: First drafts rarely represent the final answer. Iteration sharpens language and analysis.
Compare perspectives to stress-test clauses: Testing clauses from both sides reveals weaknesses. This improves negotiation readiness.
Control tone and legal style: Tone affects enforceability and perception. Explicit style instructions improve consistency.
Modify, iterate, and reuse winning prompts: Effective prompts become reusable assets. Iteration improves them over time. Reuse increases efficiency and consistency.
Risks and Limitations When Using AI Prompts for Lawyers
Today, 72% of legal professionals believe AI is a 'force for good' in the legal field. However, lawyers must understand the limits of AI tools to use them responsibly and ethically.
While AI can accelerate drafting, review, analysis, and research, it does not replace professional judgment or legal accountability. Misunderstanding these limitations can introduce risk, compromise confidentiality, or lead to incorrect conclusions.
AI hallucinations and fabricated information: AI systems can generate confident but incorrect statements, including nonexistent cases, statutes, or contractual norms. Lawyers must independently verify all outputs before relying on them.
Confidentiality and data privacy concerns: Using AI with sensitive client information can pose confidentiality risks if data-handling practices are unclear or insecure. Lawyers must ensure compliance with professional obligations and internal data policies.
Lack of jurisdiction-specific knowledge: AI often lacks a clear understanding of jurisdiction-specific laws, regulatory nuances, and local market practices. Outputs may appear correct in general terms but fail to comply with applicable law.
Over-reliance and diminished legal judgment: Excessive dependence on AI can weaken critical legal analysis and professional skepticism. Lawyers must treat AI as a support tool, not a substitute for judgment.
Bias and inconsistency in AI outputs: AI outputs may reflect biases in training data or produce inconsistent results across similar prompts. This can distort risk assessment or negotiation strategy if left unchecked.
Inability to provide true legal advice: AI cannot form an attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. Responsibility for interpretation, advice, and outcomes always rests with the lawyer.
Outdated or incomplete information: AI systems may rely on incomplete or outdated legal knowledge. Lawyers must confirm that outputs reflect current law and market practice.
Inadequate analysis of complex legal issues: Highly nuanced, fact-specific, or novel legal issues often exceed AI’s analytical depth. These matters require human expertise and tailored reasoning.
Security vulnerabilities and prompt injection: Poor prompt hygiene or unsecured systems can expose workflows to manipulation or data leakage. Lawyers must remain vigilant about how prompts are structured and where AI tools operate.
Use AI Prompts Built for Lawyers with Spellbook
Generic AI prompts often fall short in legal work because they lack the context, precision, and doctrinal nuance required for high-quality legal writing. Contract drafting and review require structured reasoning, awareness of jurisdiction, and careful risk allocation. Generic prompts struggle to deliver these consistently.
Spellbook positions its prompts as purpose-built for lawyers and real legal workflows, rather than general AI experimentation. These pre-built legal prompts guide lawyers through drafting, revising, and analyzing contracts to ensure outputs align with professional standards and commercial realities.
AI prompts can help streamline client service by providing quick, consistent answers to legal FAQs, directing clients to resources, and automating new matter intakes. However, AI cannot replace legal professionals and must be monitored for accuracy.
How Can AI Prompts Enhance Legal Document Drafting?
AI prompts simplify legal drafting by helping AI generate drafts, suggest language, and identify key issues. Spellbook integrates with Word for seamless legal document drafting.
How Do I Train My AI Tool to Understand Complex Legal Prompts?
Start by using precise language that clearly defines legal terms and context. Provide examples, such as past case precedents, contract templates, and legal references, to help AI generate more accurate outputs.
AI tools like Spellbook are already pre-trained on legal documents and built for law firms, so you can start generating and reviewing content instantly. No extra setup needed.
What Makes an Effective AI Prompt for Legal Work?
Effective prompts include jurisdiction, document type, goal, tone, and any clause preferences. Adding details like deadlines, industry context, and party roles helps the AI generate more precise, legally relevant output.
Can Spellbook’s AI Prompts Be Used Directly Inside Microsoft Word?
Yes. Spellbook integrates natively with Microsoft Word, enabling lawyers to access and use AI prompts directly within the documents they draft or review. This eliminates the need to switch between applications or to copy-paste between tools.
How Does Spellbook Improve the Quality of AI Prompt Outputs for Lawyers?
Spellbook improves the quality of AI outputs for lawyers by being trained specifically on legal documents and workflows. Unlike general-purpose AI tools, Spellbook is engineered to understand legal language, contract structure, and the context in which legal professionals operate.
Does Spellbook Require Extensive Training or Setup to Start Using AI Prompts?
No. Spellbook is a plug-and-play solution that requires no complex configuration, lengthy training periods, or IT setup. Designed for immediate usability, it can be installed within seconds and accessed directly from the Microsoft Word add-ins menu. This makes Spellbook accessible to lawyers of all technical skill levels.
Can AI Prompts Replace Legal Expertise?
No. AI prompts enhance workflow efficiency, but legal reasoning, negotiation strategy, and ethical judgment remain human responsibilities. AI helps accelerate work, not replace professional expertise.
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
.png)
.png)
