Attorney-Client Privilege in the Age of AI: Protecting Confidentiality

A lawyer under pressure to maximize efficiency might upload sensitive client information to a free, public AI tool for a quick summary. While that one click may save hours of work, it can immediately compromise the client's privacy.

AI is quickly changing the legal field, creating significant challenges for maintaining attorney-client privilege and client confidentiality. But when used responsibly in secure, specialized legal platforms like Spellbook, AI offers tremendous benefits, including enhanced efficiency, higher accuracy, and deeper insight into complex documents.

In this article, you’ll see how to navigate evolving AI risks, outline essential ethical duties, and provide best practices for integrating AI into your workflow.

Key Takeaways

• The use of AI in legal work raises questions about client data confidentiality and legal privilege—requiring lawyers to implement appropriate safeguards.
• Lawyers must comply with professional conduct rules for data protection and understand how AI systems process, store, and potentially share confidential data.
• Secure AI tools such as Spellbook can process privileged documents under attorney supervision while maintaining confidentiality through measures that include encryption and zero data retention controls.

Attorney-Client Privilege in the Era of AI

The attorney-client privilege prohibits the disclosure of communications between a client and an attorney made to secure legal advice. The rise of AI introduces several major risks that can harm this privilege:

• Disclosure to Third Parties: When you enter confidential data into a public GenAI platform (like the free version of ChatGPT), the AI vendor becomes an unauthorized third party. This exposure can immediately waive the privilege.
• Residual Data and Reuse. Public GenAI systems often keep inputs to train their models. This means your privileged content could be retained indefinitely or appear in future responses given to other users.
• Lack of Attorney Control: AI that works independently, without a lawyer's direct supervision, can waive privilege. Windows Recall, for example, automatically captures screenshots of your screen and may process privileged information.
• Lack of Client Consent or Disclosure: Failure to inform the client or obtain their informed consent when using a third-party technology (the AI vendor) can violate ethical obligations.

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Using AI in Legal Practice

Compliance with professional responsibility rules now includes understanding AI risks and obtaining client consent when relevant.

• Guidance from Law Societies and Bar Associations: Bar associations emphasize that attorneys must understand the technology they use for client work and maintain data confidentiality, regardless of the tools they use.
• Professional Responsibility Rules on Technology Competence: Model Rule 1.1 Comment 8 requires attorneys to understand how using AI could impact client confidentiality. Firms should implement training that covers AI-specific issues and keep everyone informed and up to date.
• Ensuring Informed Consent When Using AI in Client Work: Some jurisdictions require lawyers to obtain informed consent before using AI for client matters. Explain to clients how AI tools work, any risks posed, and the safeguards implemented. Keep a record of the conversation.
• Disclosure Obligations When AI Assists in Legal Services: When AI plays a significant role in representation, discuss its use with clients. Be transparent about AI's role in your services, as this clarity protects both your clients and your practice. If an AI tool is breached or the vendor changes data-handling practices, inform affected clients immediately. 

How to Use AI Responsibly While Preserving Attorney-Client Privilege

When implemented with proactive governance and appropriate security measures, AI use doesn’t have to be risky. Here are several practices for responsible AI use:

• Establish Firmwide Approved AI Use and Compliance Policies

Create written policies specifying which AI tools are approved for sensitive client work. Include specific guidelines on what information can be shared with each AI-powered system. Policies can ensure compliance with professional conduct rules without hindering efficiency.

• Use Encrypted and Privilege-Protecting AI Tools

Always choose AI platforms that offer encrypted data handling. Spellbook, for example, automates document review while maintaining confidentiality through features such as zero-data retention and a secure setup in Microsoft Word.

• Avoid Inputting Client-Identifiable or Confidential Data into Public AI Models

Never input client-identifiable or confidential data into public AI models. These systems often use your prompts, responses, and documents as training data. AI platforms designed explicitly for legal professionals, such as Spellbook, have built-in protections to protect confidentiality and privacy.

• Document AI Usage and Periodically Review for Compliance

Keep records of when and how AI is used, and routinely review them for compliance. Regular audits help prevent accidental privilege erosion as technology changes and regulations evolve.

• Perform Legal Research Without Sharing Sensitive Data

AI can improve efficiency and breadth in legal research while maintaining discretion by only searching public case law. This means you don't have to share any client-specific facts to get the information you need. Lawyers must always verify citations and legal conclusions.

• Draft and Summarize Contracts Within Privileged Controls

Use tools that operate within your firm's secure environment (e.g., Spellbook in Word) to draft and review contracts efficiently. Spellbook can flag unusual terms and suggest standard clauses while maintaining confidentiality within your existing controlled infrastructure.

• Use Privately Trained AI Models

For particularly sensitive matters, choose an AI tool that can learn from a library of your firm's documents within a private environment. These solutions provide maximum control over data.

• Enhance Efficiency Without Compromising Oversight

AI should enhance lawyers’ capabilities, not replace their judgment. Ensure an AI tool maintains lawyer oversight of all AI-assisted work and enables them to carefully review AI-generated suggestions before using them in client representation.

How Spellbook Protects Attorney-Client Privilege with a Secure AI Platform

Spellbook empowers attorneys to use AI confidently while maintaining full control, confidentiality, and compliance with professional ethics. The system operates with zero data retention, ensuring your client files never become training data for language models. Spellbook integrates privilege protection features into AI workflows through encrypted document handling and adherence to GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and PIPEDA.

For example, if a corporate law team needs to review hundreds of NDAs for an acquisition, Spellbook can quickly analyze the agreements, flag unusual terms, and suggest standard clauses without exposing any client information. Attorneys review each suggestion and make all final decisions, maintaining complete control.

Discover how Spellbook safeguards attorney-client privilege while accelerating legal workflows — try Spellbook free or contact the team today.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Does the Attorney-Client Privilege Protect?

Attorney-client privilege protects confidential communications between attorneys and clients. This protection applies to verbal conversations, written communications, and documents exchanged during legal representation. 

Does Using AI Jeopardize the Attorney-Client Privilege?

No, using AI does not automatically jeopardize the attorney-client privilege. However, privilege is at risk when confidential data is shared with unsecured or publicly trained AI models, which may expose sensitive information.

 Can Client Data be Safely Used in AI-Assisted Legal Tools?

Yes, client data can be safely used in AI-assisted legal tools, provided the platform uses a private and secure cloud model, doesn’t share or transmit client information without encryption, and doesn't train on user data.

What Steps Should Law Firms Take Before Adopting AI Technology?

Steps include: 1) conduct vendor due diligence to examine how an AI platform processes, stores, and protects data, 2) update AI-use policies to specify approved tools and the safeguards required for their use, 3) ensure secure data governance by entering contractual agreements that prohibit data sharing, 4) train all attorneys on proper AI usage, and 5) implement regular audits.

Are There Professional Guidelines on Using AI Responsibly in Legal Practice?

Yes. Many bar associations have released guidance, including the ABA (Model Rule 1.1, Comment 8). They emphasize the duty of technology competence, requiring lawyers to understand how AI can affect confidentiality. For example, the New York State Bar Association guidelines stress the duty to verify all AI outputs for accuracy, given the risk of "hallucinations" or the generation of false information.

How Can Lawyers Verify that an AI Platform is Privilege Compliant?

The platform must offer secure data environments and encrypted storage. Review the contract or terms of service to ensure your inputs can never be used as training data. Look for industry-standard security certifications (e.g., SOC 2 Type II) and guarantees of compliance with major privacy regulations such as GDPR and CCPA.

 How Do Cloud-Based AI Tools Impact Attorney-Client Privilege?

Privilege stays protected only if the cloud service adheres to strict confidentiality standards. This means using encrypted data transmission, maintaining strict access controls, and having a contract that bans the service provider from ever sharing or using client information.

‍