Is ChatGPT Legal for Lawyers? Ethics, Risks, and Best Practices Explained

Is ChatGPT legal for lawyers? It’s a question many legal professionals are asking as artificial intelligence (AI) tools become more common in research, drafting, and day-to-day practice. 

While the speed and efficiency are appealing, so are the concerns around ethics, compliance, and client confidentiality.

The reality is that using ChatGPT in a legal setting comes with real risks. Issues such as data security, professional responsibility, and the accuracy of AI-generated content can’t be overlooked. Lawyers must navigate a complex landscape of rules and expectations that go far beyond convenience or productivity.

Learn what the rules say, where the risks lie, and how to use AI responsibly in your practice.

Key takeaways

• Use with caution – ChatGPT can assist with legal tasks, but lawyers must supervise outputs to avoid ethical, factual, or legal errors.
• Protect confidentiality – Avoid entering sensitive client data into public AI tools. Use legal-specific platforms like Spellbook that enforce Zero Data Retention.
• Not a legal advisor – ChatGPT cannot give legal advice or replace professional judgment; it lacks context, licensing, and legal accountability.

What is the Legal Framework for AI in Law Practice?

This table summarizes the current legal frameworks regarding the use of AI in the legal industry:

‍

As the use of AI in the legal industry increases, so do the associated risks. David Wilkins from Harvard Law School argues that while AI can revolutionize the legal sector, access to sophisticated tools may remain limited for many professionals, potentially widening existing inequalities. He also points out that AI software will affect how law professionals are trained and what skills they will need in the future.

The Ethical Considerations for Lawyers Using ChatGPT

The Preliminary Guidelines issued by New Jersey's Supreme Court Committee on AI outline ethical considerations for legal professionals using AI. These guidelines complement existing Rules of Professional Conduct and focus on how attorneys should integrate AI into their daily operations.

The guidelines acknowledge the benefits of AI while addressing key issues, such as its tendency to generate convincing but false information. They emphasize that lawyers must adapt their practices to technological innovations while maintaining core ethical standards. Two key principles from the Committee include:

• Lawyers must uphold diligence, honesty, client advocacy, and confidentiality when using AI.
• Lawyers are not required to disclose their use of AI.

When using AI for tasks such as document drafting, reviewing, or legal research, lawyers encounter several ethical dilemmas:

• Billing and invoicing: With AI automating repetitive tasks, how should lawyers bill clients? Should charges reflect the time saved or the value of the results delivered?
• AI-generated legal advice: Traditionally, lawyers provide advice based on expertise and a deep understanding of clients' situations. However, AI can generate advice quickly based solely on input data. While AI delivers faster results, quality may be compromised.
• Bias and discrimination: AI systems can unintentionally reflect biases due to incomplete data, leading to discriminatory outcomes. Lawyers must be aware of this risk and ensure work remains unbiased.

ChatGPT Legal Client Confidentiality Concerns

Maintaining client confidentiality is one of lawyers’ most critical obligations. Using AI tools such as ChatGPT for law presents significant challenges in this area. For instance, ChatGPT may use input data for further training and improvement of its models, raising concerns about breaches of attorney-client privilege.

When entering sensitive client information into public AI platforms, there is a risk that third parties could access this data, compromising confidentiality. Here are key risks and mitigation strategies:

• Risk of data breach: Choose AI tools such as Spellbook that offer Zero Data Retention policies with its partners OpenAI and Anthropic. Preventing data retention ensures that client data is neither stored nor used for training.
• Lack of privacy: Avoid inputting sensitive client details into public AI tools. Instead, opt for specialized legal AI tools that prioritize data privacy and encryption.

{{cta-surprise-red}}

How Can Lawyers Use ChatGPT Legally?

Legal professionals can maximize the benefits of AI while maintaining the highest ethical standards by embracing these best practices:

Complement Your Expertise with AI Assistance

AI tools such as ChatGPT can help lawyers do their jobs better. However, they shouldn't replace a lawyer's own thinking. Think of AI as your helper for reviewing cases, creating first drafts, and quickly sorting through lots of documents. You, Legal professionals, should still be in charge of the final work.

Protect Client Confidentiality with Secure AI Tools

Keeping client information private is important for lawyers. Be careful not to put private client details into regular AI tools that anyone can use. Instead, choose special legal AI tools such as Spellbook, with its Zero Data Retention policy, built to keep information safe.

Ensure Fairness and Equity in AI-Assisted Work

AI systems might have some built-in unfairness because of how they were trained. Always double-check AI research against real court decisions, make sure different viewpoints are included, and be extra careful when using AI for important cases.

Spellbook's legal-specific training minimizes potential bias in document creation and review. The platform's benchmarking features help ensure all legal documents align with industry standards, supporting fair and equitable representation for every client regardless of background.‍

Implement Thorough Review Processes

AI can make mistakes or use outdated legal information. Make sure to verify facts against trusted sources, check that all case references are correct and current, and review AI drafts to ensure they make sense and follow legal rules.

Spellbook facilitates comprehensive review with features that highlight changes, explain suggested modifications, and maintain transparency throughout the document lifecycle. Its redlining capabilities and change tracking make supervision straightforward.‍

Maintain Proper Attribution and Copyright Compliance

When using AI-created content from ChatGPT, remember that it might include information from copyrighted materials. Always properly credit any cases or laws mentioned in AI writing. Make sure the content doesn't include copy-protected legal documents. 

Spellbook supports appropriate attribution by helping you refine and customize AI-assisted content. The platform's collaborative design ensures meaningful human involvement in all created documents, helping lawyers maintain proper copyright compliance while still leveraging AI for greater productivity.‍

Embrace Continuous Learning

The legal profession has always evolved alongside technology. To stay on top of things, take continuing education classes about legal technology, join discussions with other lawyers about using AI, and regularly check that tools such as Spellbook still meet professional standards. Staying informed about new AI developments enables legal professionals to use these tools responsibly.

ChatGPT in Legal Document Generation and Review

ChatGPT offers quick, accurate document reviews that address grammar, clarity, compliance, and formatting. Most lawyers start experimenting with AI’s effectiveness in drafting and reviewing legal documents with ChatGPT. When using ChatGPT for document drafting and reviewing, keep these risks in mind:

• Speed vs. accuracy: Drafting documents quickly is possible, but thoroughly examining generated content is necessary for accuracy and clarity.
• Error risks: While grammar and formatting errors are minimal, there remains a risk of false statements and contextual inaccuracies.
• Data extraction limitations: ChatGPT can quickly extract sections for review but may overlook essential information if the data provided is insufficient.

However, it’s important to note that while ChatGPT is a versatile tool, it has limitations compared to specialized legal solutions such as Spellbook. Spellbook excels by understanding the context of your documents and drafting new clauses and contract sections with precision, taking into account legal nuances and specific instructions. 

{{cta-surprise-red}}

‍Enhancing Legal Drafting with AI-Powered Assistance

AI assistance streamlines the legal document drafting process across all phases, research, writing, and reviewing. Access to multiple databases allows AI to evaluate legal information effectively and extract details for crafting documents.

Spellbook is one of the leading AI tools for lawyers. It can draft clauses or entire contracts, offering users multiple versions based on their instructions. Lawyers can review these to find the most suitable one and customize further as needed. Spellbook also conducts comprehensive legal document reviews, flagging risky sections, poor language, inconsistencies, compliance issues, and more.

AI helps make your legal writing quicker and more effective while reducing the chances of errors. Examples of AI significantly aiding in legal processes include:

• IBM's Watson Discovery Tool: Legal Motion used this tool to draft initial responses to complaints during early litigation stages, accelerating the process and allowing more time for strategic planning.
• Everlaw's AI Tool: A Texas law firm, Allensworth, used this tool to organize large volumes of documentation. It removed duplicates, verified information, and provided quick access to evidence for document preparation.

Spellbook vs. ChatGPT

While general AI tools like ChatGPT may seem convenient for legal work, they present serious risks that specialized legal AI solutions like Spellbook eliminate. ChatGPT's limitations become immediately apparent when handling complex legal documents:

Hallucinations and False Information: ChatGPT routinely fabricates case citations and legal principles that don't exist. The infamous Mata v. Avianca case demonstrated how ChatGPT could confidently generate six entirely fictional legal cases, leading to sanctions against the attorneys who relied on it. Spellbook's legal-specific training virtually eliminates this risk.

Legal Understanding: ChatGPT lacks specialized legal training, often misinterpreting standard clauses and missing critical legal nuances. Spellbook is trained on billions of lines of legal text, giving it deep comprehension of legal terminology, jurisdictional differences, and industry-specific standards.

Workflow Integration: ChatGPT requires constant switching between platforms, copying and pasting text from legal documents. Spellbook integrates directly into Microsoft Word, where lawyers already work, providing seamless assistance without disrupting established workflows.

Client Confidentiality: ChatGPT's terms allow client information to be used for AI training, creating serious confidentiality concerns. Spellbook maintains a strict Zero Data Retention policy, ensuring client information remains completely protected.

Specialized Capabilities: ChatGPT offers no legal-specific features like redlining, contract benchmarking, or playbook integration. Spellbook provides these purpose-built tools specifically designed for transactional legal work.

For legal professionals seeking reliable assistance with confidential documents, Spellbook delivers specialized expertise that ChatGPT simply cannot match. When your professional reputation depends on accuracy and reliability, choosing the right tool matters.

ChatGPT's Capabilities in Contract Review and Analysis

ChatGPT can quickly analyze entire documents regardless of complexity based on your prompts. Spellbook operates similarly but offers a deeper understanding of legal context with innovative review options. It can identify key issues such as:

• Language problems
• Missing clauses
• Ambiguity
• Weak negotiation points
• Compliance issues
• Inconsistencies

For example, when reviewing a lengthy contract, lawyers may focus on critical aspects but miss minor typing errors such as a missing zero in the contract value which can significantly impact deals. Fortunately, AI can flag such problems and suggest solutions.

Both ChatGPT and specialized legal AI tools excel at detecting ambiguous wording that could lead to contract errors or delays in execution. Transactional lawyers dealing primarily with contracts experience the most benefits from these tools. Here are some contracts frequently drafted or reviewed by Spellbook:

• Master service agreement
• Non-disclosure agreements
• Fixed-price contracts
• Time-and-material contracts
• Partnership agreements
• Bills of sale
• Employee agreements
• Licensing agreements
• Indemnity agreements

{{cta-surprise-red}}

ChatGPT's Assistance in Legal Analysis

AI has significant potential to enhance legal research, making it a valuable ally in case analysis. It can assist with everything from case evaluations to legal research, providing quick access to applicable frameworks, citations, and sources that inform your court strategy.

When integrated into legal workflows with proper guidelines, AI can enhance legal analysis through features such as:

• Automated document review
• Identification of legal precedents 
• Auto-filling complex clauses
• AI-assisted legal case summarization
• Real-time contextual insights

Practical Uses of ChatGPT in Law Firms

By taking over manual and repetitive tasks from paralegals and lawyers, AI allows legal professionals to focus on high-value work. The impact of AI innovations on law firms includes:

• Automation of repetitive legal tasks for valuable time savings
• Reduction of errors and increased productivity in contract management
• Accelerated workflows for document review, drafting, and research

Discover our favorite ChatGPT prompts for lawyers..

Automating Routine Legal Tasks

Here are several routine tasks that AI can efficiently handle:

• Document summarization
• Data mining, extraction, and entry
• Contract proofreading and review
• Document organization
• Case outcome prediction
• Drafting memos, letters, and other documents

As AI tools like ChatGPT continue to evolve, many legal professionals are incorporating them into their daily practice. However, this raises a key question: Can ChatGPT replace paralegals? 

While AI can automate many routine tasks traditionally handled by paralegals, it lacks the necessary understanding of legal contexts, communication skills, and critical thinking that paralegals provide.

Streamlining Law Firm Workflows Using Spellbook

AI-powered software such as Spellbook significantly enhances efficiency and streamlines daily workflows in law firms. Its integration with Microsoft Word makes it user-friendly for legal professionals to adopt. Spellbook can improve your workflow with:

• Efficient document drafting: Draft legal documents using standardized templates or custom instructions tailored to your specific needs. This ensures accuracy, saves time, and reduces manual errors.
• Superior client confidentiality: Unlike generic AI tools, Spellbook includes built-in confidentiality measures that protect sensitive information.
• Streamlined review process: The instant review feature quickly scans documents for inconsistencies, errors, or outdated clauses, helping you move cases forward more efficiently.
• Best-practice document reviews: Spellbook lets you compare contracts against over 2,300 industry benchmarks to ensure compliance with legal standards and best practices, reducing the need for time-consuming manual reviews.

{{cta-draft}}

Final Thoughts

Lawyers can benefit from using AI for tedious and time-consuming tasks if they adhere to professional standards. Legal regulatory bodies recognize the advantages of AI in the legal sector and are working towards establishing guidelines for its use. Key concerns regarding AI usage in the legal industry include:

• The ethical and transparent use of AI tools in law firms
• Compliance with professional guidelines regarding confidentiality and bias
• Validation of AI-generated legal information to ensure accuracy

With rapid technological advancements in AI for legal work, being a lawyer has never been more exciting! Stay tuned for upcoming updates on Spellbook.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Lawyers Ensure Confidentiality When Using ChatGPT?

Yes, lawyers can ensure confidentiality when using ChatGPT by not sharing sensitive client information with the chatbot. Or, they can ask for written client consent when necessary. If this is not feasible, lawyers should opt for reliable AI tools with strong security measures and Zero Data Retention protocols, such as Spellbook. 

Are There Specific Tasks That Lawyers Should Avoid Delegating to ChatGPT?

Yes, there are specific tasks that lawyers should avoid delegating to ChatGPT. These include:

• Giving legal advice
• Handling sensitive client information
• Drafting high-stakes documents
• Completing legal research
• Making final decisions about cases and contracts

Their expertise is crucial in these areas to comply with ethics rules and prevent legal malpractice

Are There Any Clear Legal Regulations Governing Lawyers' Use of ChatGPT?

Yes, there are clear legal regulations governing lawyers’ use of ChatGPT in several states. Currently, the state bars of California, Michigan, and Florida emphasize the responsibilities of lawyers using AI to maintain professional ethics and client confidentiality while overseeing AI outputs. As long as they comply with these rules, lawyers can legally use ChatGPT without disclosing it in court.

Can ChatGPT Give Legal Advice?

No, ChatGPT cannot provide legal advice. It lacks the licensed attorney's professional judgment, ethical responsibility, and contextual understanding required for proper legal counsel.

True legal advice requires professional judgment based on years of training, understanding of jurisdiction-specific nuances, ethical responsibility to clients, proper accountability, and ongoing education about changing legal standards—none of which ChatGPT possesses.

Is ChatGPT Effective for Reviewing Legal Documents?

No, ChatGPT is not effective for reviewing legal documents. It lacks the specialized training and features needed for reliable document analysis in professional legal contexts.

ChatGPT frequently misidentifies legal issues, misses jurisdiction-specific requirements, and struggles with complex legal terminology. It lacks up-to-date knowledge of industry regulations and raises serious confidentiality concerns since its terms allow client information to be retained and used for AI training.